Home/Technical Guide/Gearbox Guides
Gearbox Guides Topic Overview Worm GearboxesPlanetary GearboxesBevel GearboxesGearbox Selection

Gearbox Guides: Worm, Planetary, and Bevel Gearboxes | TEA

Gearboxes in Mechanical Engineering: An Overview

Gearboxes transmit torque, convert speeds, and match drive machines to driven machines. Choosing correctly between worm, planetary, bevel, or spur gearboxes determines efficiency, service life, and total system cost.

Quick Orientation

High efficiency and compact design → Planetary gearbox. Self-locking and angular offset → Worm gearbox. 90° axis offset with high load → Bevel gearbox.

The Most Important Gearbox Types

Worm Gearboxes

Worm gearboxes consist of a helical worm and a worm wheel. They enable large gear ratios in a single stage (i = 5 to 100) and are self-locking at high ratios. Efficiency typically ranges from 40 to 90 % — depending on lead angle and lubrication.

Planetary Gearboxes

Planetary gearboxes achieve efficiencies of 95–98 % per stage and transmit torque through multiple simultaneous tooth engagements. The result: high power density in a compact package. Typical gear ratios: i = 3 to 10 per stage, up to i = 1000 in multi-stage configurations.

Bevel Gearboxes

Bevel gearboxes enable power transmission between intersecting axes — typically at 90°. Spiral-toothed bevel gears run more quietly than straight-toothed ones and are suited for higher speeds and loads.

Comparison: Efficiency and Gear Ratio

Gearbox Type Efficiency Gear Ratio i Self-Locking
Worm Gearbox 40 – 90 % 5 – 100 ✓ (at small lead angle)
Planetary Gearbox 95 – 98 % 3 – 10 (per stage)
Bevel Gearbox 95 – 98 % 1 – 6
Spur Gearbox 97 – 99 % 1.25 – 6 (per stage)

Selection Criteria at a Glance

  • Required gear ratio: Large i (> 20) in a single stage → worm gearbox; small i → spur or planetary gearbox
  • Efficiency: Energy-intensive continuous operation → prefer planetary or spur gearboxes
  • Self-locking: Holding loads without a brake → worm gearbox with sufficiently small lead angle
  • Shaft orientation: 90° angle → worm or bevel gearbox
  • Package size: Compact at high torque → planetary gearbox

Note on Sizing

For a definitive gearbox selection, we recommend contacting our application engineers directly. We will size the optimal gearbox based on your load, speed, and installation data.

All Articles on Gearboxes

Comparison

Worm Gearboxes vs. Planetary Gearboxes: Which One Fits?

Efficiency, self-locking, noise, and cost in a direct comparison — with a decision guide for your application.

6 Min. LesezeitLesen →
Guide

Planetary Gearboxes: Design, Function, and Selection

High power density, zero backlash, and compact form — when does a planetary gearbox make sense?

7 Min. LesezeitLesen →
Comparison

Bevel Gearboxes: Types and Selection Criteria

Spiral, hypoid, and Zerol bevel gears at a glance — differences and application recommendations.

6 Min. LesezeitLesen →
Tutorial

Calculating Gearbox Efficiency

How to determine the overall efficiency of multi-stage gearbox units — with a calculation example.

7 Min. LesezeitLesen →
Guide

Self-Locking: When Is It Desirable?

Self-locking gearboxes prevent back-driving without a brake — function, limits, and typical applications.

6 Min. LesezeitLesen →
Tutorial

Spur Gearboxes: Fundamentals and Sizing

Single-stage, multi-stage, helical — how to properly dimension spur gearboxes.

7 Min. LesezeitLesen →

Gearboxes from TEA

Worm, planetary, and bevel gearboxes in stock — with personal consultation.

Browse Gearbox Range →
Alexander Olenberger

Über den Autor

Alexander Olenberger

Senior Application Engineer · Technische Antriebselemente GmbH

Alexander Olenberger advises design engineers and procurement professionals on the selection and sizing of gearboxes, drive systems, and machine components.

Geprüft am 5. März 2026
+49 40 538892111 sales@tea-hamburg.de