Beta – TEA Academy is new. The content is for learning; it has been prepared with care but has not yet been technically approved. It does not replace design based on the manufacturer’s specifications. Found an error? Write to us.

← Back to Module Overview
MODULE 3 · UNIT 2 OF 5

Efficiency and Losses

approx. 8 min · Learning goals, example, knowledge check

Learning goals — after this unit, you will be able to …

  • calculate the overall efficiency of a multi-stage gear train as the product of the stage efficiencies;
  • calculate the power loss of a gearbox and classify it according to the main types of loss;
  • Explain why an efficiency of 50% is the theoretical limit for self-locking—calculated using static efficiency when stationary and operating efficiency when in motion.

Efficiency per stage and in the chain

The efficiency η describes the proportion of the input power that actually reaches the output shaft. The remainder is dissipated as frictional heat:

η = P_ab / P_an

P_ab = Output power · P_an = Drive power · η = Efficiency (0…1)

When there are multiple consecutive gear stages (such as a two-stage planetary gearbox), the stage efficiencies are multiplied to yield the overall efficiency—a common misconception is to add them together or calculate their average:

η_ges = η₁ · η₂ · … · η_n

Example: Two stages at 95% each result in η_ges = 0.95 · 0.95 = 0.9025 = 90.25%—not 95%.

The power loss, which must be dissipated as heat, is directly derived from the drive power and efficiency:

P_V = P_an · (1 − η)

P_V = Power loss (heat)

Where the losses come from

Four types of losses combine to form the total power loss of a gearbox:

  • Gear losses—sliding friction between the tooth flanks; predominant in worm gearboxes, comparatively low in helical gearboxes.
  • Bearing losses—friction in the rolling bearings of each shaft—increase with speed.
  • Seal losses—friction at shaft seals, usually the smallest component.
  • Churning losses—lubricating oil “sprayed” by the rotating gears; increases with speed.
Typical efficiencies by gearbox type
Gear Type Efficiency per stage
Spur gear (straight-toothed/helical-toothed)95–99 %
Planetary, single-stage95–98 %
Planetary, two-stage90–96 %
Bevel gear, spiral-tooth gear94–97 %
Hypoid90–96 %
Worm gear (i = 10)60–90 %
Worm gear (i = 50)30–60 %
Figure 3.2-1: Efficiency Ranges by Gear Type. Source: Calculation Method for This Learning Unit
Description and values of the figure

Spur and planetary gearboxes achieve the highest efficiencies (up to 99%). Worm gearboxes with high gear ratios (here, i=50) are highlighted because they are the only type whose efficiency range can fall below the 50% line: At that point, the gearset is self-locking even during operation (dynamically). Worm gearboxes can be statically self-locking even at higher operating efficiencies because, when stationary, the greater static friction comes into play. This is technically useful but results in noticeably more power loss than with other designs.

Efficiency Ranges by Gear Type
Namefrom (%)to (%)
Stirnradgetriebe 9599
Planetengetriebe, 1-stufig 9598
Planetengetriebe, 2-stufig 9096
Kegelradgetriebe, spiralverzahnt 9497
Hypoidgetriebe 9096
Schneckengetriebe i=10 6090
Schneckengetriebe i=50 3060

Reverse efficiency and the 50% limit

The efficiency η given so far applies to the power flow from the drive to the output (forward). If the load acts in the opposite direction against the gearbox—for example, if a weight attempts to turn the output shaft backward—the reverse efficiency η′ applies, which can be roughly estimated from η:

η′ ≈ 2 − 1 / η

η′ = reverse efficiency (load drives) · η = forward efficiency (drive drives)

If η = 0.5 is substituted, this yields η′ = 2 − 1/0.5 = 0. Precisely at an efficiency of 50 %, the load can, mathematically speaking, no longer drive the gearbox backward—this is the theoretical limit of self-locking. The decisive factor is which efficiency value is used: For holding the load at a standstill, the static efficiency (start-up, static friction) is what counts, and this is significantly lower than the operating efficiency. A worm gearbox with a 60–70% operating efficiency can therefore be self-locking when stationary. If the operating efficiency is already below 50%, the gearbox locks even while in motion. The section “Self-locking: Benefits and Limitations” explains why this still does not replace a brake.

Mnemonic

Efficiency values multiply across multiple stages; they do not add up. Furthermore, when η = 50%, this represents the theoretical limit of self-locking—calculated using static efficiency when at a standstill and operating efficiency when in motion. Gearboxes with efficiencies over 90% (spur, planetary, and bevel gearboxes) are never self-locking.

Worked example

Given

A 7.5-kW motor drives a screw conveyor via a two-stage planetary gearbox. Stage efficiencies: η₁ = 0.96, η₂ = 0.95.

Calculation

  • Overall efficiency: η_ges = η₁ · η₂ = 0.96 · 0.95 = 0.912 (91.2 %)
  • Output power: P_ab = P_an · η_ges = 7.5 kW · 0.912 = 6.84 kW
  • Power loss: P_V = P_an − P_ab = 7.5 kW − 6.84 kW = 0.66 kW (660 W)

The 660 W is dissipated as heat through the gear housing and helps determine how large and how well-ventilated the housing must be designed.

Figure 3.2-2: Efficiency cascade of the worked example. Schematic illustration, not to scale. Source: Calculation Method for This Learning Unit
Description and values of the figure

The input power of 7.50 kW passes through two gear stages. After stage 1 (efficiency η1 =0.96), 7.20 kW remains, while the remainder (0.30 kW) is lost. After stage 2 (η2 =0.95), 6.84 kW remains, with an additional loss of 0.36 kW. The total loss across both stages is 0.66 kW, and the overall efficiency is 6.84/7.50 ≈ 91.2%.

Efficiency cascade of the worked example
LevelInput (kW)EfficiencyOutput (kW)Loss (kW)
Level 17,50η₁ = 0.967,200,30
Level 27,20η₂ = 0.956,840,36
Total7,50η_ges ≈ 0.9126,840,66

Knowledge check

Answer all three questions, then click "Check". From 2 of 3 correct answers, the unit counts as completed. You can retry at any time.

This feature needs JavaScript. You can still read the learning content without JavaScript.

Question 1 of 3: Two gear stages each have η = 0.95. How do you correctly calculate the overall efficiency η_ges?
Explanation

The efficiency values of multistage gearboxes are multiplied: η_ges = η1 × η2 = 0.95 × 0.95 = 0.9025 = 90.25%. Even two very good individual stages combined result in a noticeably lower overall efficiency.

Source: Calculating the Gearbox Efficiency →
Question 2 of 3: A motor with a power of P_an = 7.5 kW drives a two-stage gearbox with a power of η_ges = 0.912. What is the output power P_ab in kW?
kW
Explanation

P_ab = P_an × η_ges = 7.5 kW × 0.912 = 6.84 kW. The remaining 0.66 kW (660 W) is dissipated as heat.

Source: Calculating the Gearbox Efficiency →
Question 3 of 3: At what efficiency η does the self-locking limit (η′ = 0) occur mathematically?
Explanation

Using the approximation η′ ≈ 2 − 1/η, η = 50% exactly equals η′ = 0: The load is just barely unable to drive the gear back, mathematically speaking. For static self-locking, the static efficiency (starting from a standstill) is relevant; for dynamic self-locking, the operating efficiency is relevant.

Source: Calculating the Gearbox Efficiency →

Please answer all three questions to activate "Check".

Further reading (optional)

Online Calculator: Efficiency Calculator (opens in a new tab) Guide: Calculating the Gearbox Efficiency (opens in a new tab) Guide: Worm Gear vs. Planetary Gearbox (opens in a new tab)

Learning purpose: calculation methods and figures are simplified teaching examples. For a real machine, the manufacturer’s specifications, the relevant standards and a check by a qualified person apply.

Curriculum v0.1 (Beta) · Status 17.09.2026 · content carefully prepared and reviewed – final sign-off to follow

+49 [40] 5388921-11 sales@tea-hamburg.de