3. Result
Annual total cost of the item under review in a scenario comparison.
Please enter at least annual demand and unit price today.
What this model does not cover
Show ▾Collapse ▴
A calculator whose limits are not stated is worthless in a purchasing discussion. These points are deliberately missing — they cannot be quantified credibly without your knowledge of the individual case.
One-time cost of switching
Requalification, first article inspection (FAI), drawing approval, tooling transfer, conversion of master data and framework processes. For safety-relevant or standard-relevant parts this is the single largest item — and it is incurred before the first saving takes effect.
Contract initiation
For concluding the agreement, the calculator assumes a single full purchase order transaction. In practice, negotiation, legal review and internal approval loops cost more. Scenario C is therefore calculated on the favourable side rather than the expensive one.
Negotiating position
When competitors drop out, you lose your benchmark and your leverage. The effect does not show in the first year but in the next price round. A dormant second source costs money and is still often the right decision.
Quality and delivery performance
Complaint rate, on-time delivery and rework differ between suppliers and often shift the result more than the unit price does. They only enter here to the extent that you quantify them yourself under shortage and downtime cost.
Cash discount, freight, small-quantity surcharges
Cash discount, freight cost, small-quantity surcharges and packaging units are not modelled separately. Build them into the unit price if they differ between the scenarios.
Uniform consumption
The average inventory is set at half the lot size — that holds for uniform consumption without safety stock. With seasonal patterns, safety stock or minimum order quantities, the real inventory is higher.
Calculation method in detail
Show ▾Collapse ▴
Every cost block can be recalculated individually. The total cost is the sum of the six blocks.
| Cost block | Formula | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Material cost | C_mat = quantity × unit price | The only block that appears on the invoice. |
| Order process | C_proc = n_orders × c_order | Under a blanket order agreement: one contract conclusion at the full rate plus n call-offs at the call-off rate. |
| Supplier relationship | C_sup = n_suppliers × c_supplier | In Scenarios B and C exactly one supplier by definition. |
| Average inventory | V_avg = quantity / (2 × n_orders) × unit price | Half the lot size with uniform consumption (sawtooth model), valued at the respective unit price. |
| Inventory holding | C_inv = V_avg × r_inv | Under a blanket order agreement, reduced by the share held at the supplier. |
| Cost of capital | C_cap = V_avg × i − C_mat × (t_pay / 365) × i | Tied-up capital less the supplier credit from the payment terms. Can become negative. |
| Shortages | C_short = C_short,today × (1 − r_avoidable) | Zero without your input — no improvement is assumed. |
| Total cost | C_total = C_mat + C_proc + C_sup + C_inv + C_cap + C_short | Annual view, excluding the one-time cost of switching supplier. |
The informational value of the price lock-in is calculated as V_lock = contract quantity × contract price × p_increase / 2 (halved because the increase is assumed to be linear over the year) and is not included in C_total. If the contract quantity in Scenario C is below the annual demand, the calculator prices the remaining quantity at Scenario B terms — with proportionally fewer purchase orders at an unchanged lot size; the table shows the base case.
Check the result against a real quotation?
The cost rates come from your own company — the bundled price and the call-off terms are something we can quantify. How bundling across linear, drive and gear technology works in practice is described on the page about supplier consolidation.
Reference values & sources
Show ▾Collapse ▴
Every reference value in this calculator comes from a published, named source and is classified by source type. The default application is the conservative end of the range — the end that makes consolidation look worse — wherever that direction can be determined unambiguously; for the cost of capital, both values are offered neutrally. Applied values are flagged in the copyable summary. Literature as of: 2026-07.
| Field | Reference | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Process cost per purchase order | ≈ €68–122 | BME e. V. 2025 (Association/study) · Mercateo / HTWK Leipzig 2017 (Study) |
| Inventory carrying rate (excl. capital) | 11% | Haufe Finance Office 2024 (Specialist publisher) · REFA 2024 (Association/study) |
| Cost of capital | 8.5–9.4% | KPMG 2025 (Study) |
| Payment terms | 32–60 days | Creditreform 2025 (Study) · Atradius 2025 (Study) |
| Bundling price advantage | 3–8% | Synprocure 2025 (Vendor source) |
Deliberately without a reference value
- Cost per supplier relationship per year: No independent association or academic source publishes a robust annual cost figure — only a single vendor report exists. The value has to come from your own controlling.
- Shortage and downtime cost: Entirely company- and plant-specific — an industry average would be misleading here.
- Blanket-order terms (call-offs, price advantage, stock shift): Contract-specific — these values should come from an actual quotation, not from literature.
Source-type classification: Association/study = independent survey with transparent methodology · Specialist publisher = editorially reviewed worked example, not an industry average · Consulting practice = experience figures from procurement consultancies with a commercial interest in the topic, not an independent study · Vendor source = publication by a commercial provider or service company — the weakest tier, used only where nothing more robust exists. Reference values do not replace your own controlling figures — they speed up the start and make the calculation traceable.